The legal system was just thrown into a tailspin of improper and unlawful usage of true laws to twist and morph the way the law works simply to resist President Trump at every turn, and it is outrageous! Numerous outlets are reporting on how federal judges just banned together to use their ability to write new laws to try and stop all things Trump implements based on his speaking points during his campaign.
Plaintiffs can BLOCK governmental decisions that they simply don’t like by stating that anything Trump said may have vaguely been against them specifically during his campaign in 2016 if this law is allowed. I am as serious as a heart attack. This essentially means that any Muslim will be able to veto a decision by Trump when it comes to anything he puts in place per the travel ban, immigration bans, etc.
Federal judges invent a new legal standard where all legal precedent can be discarded to resist President Trump.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals invented a new legal standard granting Muslims unlimited power over national security in their decision to maintain the injunction against President Trump’s travel ban executive order (via Breitbart).
The 10 judges in the majority upheld the decision of district courts that the executive order violated the Fourth Amendment on the basis of campaign rhetoric, inventing a new legal standard.
The order, called Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry, “speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination” ruled the activist judges.
The court’s decision relies on a newly created legal standard that has no basis in previous Supreme Court decisions. The new standard allows plaintiffs to block neutral government actions on the basis of the campaign or private statements.
“In looking behind the face of the government’s action for facts to show the alleged bad faith… the majority grants itself the power to conduct an extratextual search for evidence suggesting bad faith, which is exactly what three Supreme Court opinions have prohibited,” wrote Judge Niemeyer in the dissent.
“The majority, now for the first time, rejects these holdings in favor of its politically desired outcome,” continues Judge Niemeyer, who was joined by just two other judges.
However, in a 10-3 ruling the majority have their way, and the decision will surely be brought before the Supreme Court where the matter will be settled once and for all.
The activists’ decision is dangerous, not just for establishing a new legal standard that will have a chilling effect on speech, but the ruling will also allow Muslim plaintiffs to petition the courts to block just about any government action that predominantly affects Muslim-majority countries.
Further, the court creates a new standard, where the feelings of a plaintiff can grant standing before a court. The Muslim plaintiff attempting to block the executive order was not affected by the travel ban directly, but claims the order increases hostilities towards Muslim-Americans.
Essentially, the progressive activist judges are creating a new legal standard where the president can be blocked from acting in the name of national security if a member of a minority group finds the action offensive.
If this decision is upheld by the Supreme Court, it will effectively block President Trump from taking any action against Muslim countries due to statements he made during the campaign offering unlimited protection to terrorist countries.
What has our country come to? Is this really something we are going to sit by and allow to happen? We must do something to make sure that this violation of just law isn’t allowed to be implemented. It literally deletes the word and need of even having a President.