Archives

Newsflash! Barrack Obama is even more stupid than originally suspected!

by Thomas Madison
I don’t mean to say that our president is COMPLETELY stupid. There are some things that he is very smart about, like the law. He was some sort of quasi-lawyer at some point. OK, that’s not a good example.
Golf! Yeah, that’s the ticket! King Hussein is very smart about golf. He loves it, he plays it a lot, and he knows just about everything there is to know about golf. He is smart at golf!
Too bad golf isn’t a part of his actual job description. It certainly doesn’t help him in the arena of foreign affairs and international relations, where his IQ and performance have been woefully deficient. He is very good at making enemies of our traditional allies and making worse enemies of our traditional enemies.
There is one area where Barrack Obama is particularly stupid. Military matters. No one would expect him to be a genius in military matters. After all, he never served a day in the military, and frankly the whole armed forces thingy seems to perplex him mightily. Where he is stupid is not listening to the finest military commanders on the planet, to whom he has immediate access at all times. They say, “Feint left.” He goes right. They say “Stay in Iraq.” He pulls us out. They say, “Never telegraph timelines or give your playbook to the enemy.” He does it reliably. The Joint Chiefs must get VERY drunk EVERY night.
King Hussein’s most recent Commander-in-Chief SNAFU is declaring to the world, which includes the inbred goat-humpers known as ISIS, that no way are we going to put ground forces in Iraq. Good job, Barrack! Remember what I just said about not giving the enemy your playbook? And “limited airstrikes?” Why do you find it necessary to telegraph that bit of useful information to ISIS? Let me tell you how that message is received by the leaders of ISIS: “We are going to smack you on the wrist, but not very hard. Please proceed with your normal “beheading of innocents” operation. We will be out of the AO (Area of Operations) before you can say, ‘Allahu Akbar!'”
My advice to the king: Stop being stupid! Stick to that which you know something about – golf, and leave the military matters to the generals and admirals.

Rogers: ‘Never say never’ for combat troops in Iraq
August 17th, 2014
02:56 PM ET

4 hours ago

Rogers: ‘Never say never’ for combat troops in Iraq

Washington (CNN) – Republican Rep. Mike Rogers told CNN Sunday he’ll “never say never” to the possibility of U.S. combat troops returning to the ground in Iraq to fight Islamic extremists.

The question has come up in recent weeks as the Obama administration has watched the Iraqi leadership stumble in a bitter war against the terrorist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Rogers, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, cautioned that he doesn’t think sending in combat troops is necessarily beneficial at this point. But he also said President Obama is giving away too much strategically by placing such strict limits on the U.S. military role up front.


Loading...



“I don’t think anyone believes that that’s the right solution for this particular problem. But we need to send the message that we are willing to stand up against growing terrorist organizations,” said Rogers, who represents Michigan’s 8th Congressional District. “This is a growing, dangerous problem and we’ve got to have a coordinated response in order to deal with it.”

Iraq is facing an onslaught from ISIS jihadists and is battling to wrest control of the strategically-located Mosul Dam from the militants, who recently took it over. As the largest dam in Iraq, it provides water and energy to much of the country. U.S. officials are concerned that if the terrorist group blows up the dam or opens the flood gates, it could endanger nearly 1.5 million lives and send floodwaters all the way to Baghdad, where the U.S. Embassy is located.

The United States staged airstrikes over the weekend as part of a joint operation with Iraqi and Kurdish forces to take back the dam from ISIS control.

When Obama authorized airstrikes in Iraq earlier this month, he said they would be limited to safeguarding U.S. interests and personnel and to help alleviate the growing humanitarian crisis. Even before the broadening of the U.S. airstrikes to protect infrastructure like the Mosul Dam, critics voiced concern about “mission creep” and have called for the President to seek congressional approval for further airstrikes.

Rogers disagrees. “I don’t think he needs to come back (to Congress) for an affirmative vote,” he said, adding that although Obama has the legal right to authorize attacks under the current Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), he should continue to work with Congress.

“This president does not play well with others when it comes to this policy,” Rogers said. “He should constantly be working with members of Congress who have lots of interests, lots of time, lots of experience with these issues. Then I think he wouldn’t get into this problem of members being irate that he doesn’t come to them for a vote.”






To Top