A document expert, who has spent the last 2.5 years examining correspondence for the government has taken apart the letter produced by Dianne Feinstein and says it is a fake. She specifically notes that the letter contains two different and distinct fonts. She also points out that the letter is filled with poor grammar and it appears to be written by someone to whom English is a second language and not a very educated PHD, who has written many articles for print. Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh.
As Compiled by The Gateway Pundit
1) I believe the letter from Dr. Ford was written by a third party.#ConfirmKavanaughNow pic.twitter.com/qbJPviP75p
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
17) My professional opinion is based on 2.5 years of being responsible for constituent letters from Congress. Meaning, I have scanned, read, reviewed, routed and responded to hundreds of them.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
19) I have a Ph.D. in sociology and a bachelor’s degree in interdisciplinary studies with a focus on creative writing.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
21) First of all, as has already been pointed out, Dr. Ford’s letter does not read like a very educated person wrote it. https://t.co/WN8kGCUMtk
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
22) Here is the letter.https://t.co/errMnJaoHF pic.twitter.com/mTN8iVUmQV
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
23) The first clue is that she capitalized “high school.” In this sentence, it doesn’t need to be capitalized. pic.twitter.com/VeDewwB4SV
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
24) It has been my experience at work that private citizens generally use their best English writing skills in communicating to Congress. Dr. Ford has a Stanford pedigree, is a PhD, and is heavily published. The letter is sloppy.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
25) The second clue is the first line of the second paragraph. As others have pointed out, the font size is not consistent; is this a sloppy printout she is sending on a letter of historic importance? pic.twitter.com/yyQUiBm6Mg
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
26) Also noteworthy is that she says “in the early 1980’s.” The grammar here is wrong – you would write “1980s” without the apostrophe. pic.twitter.com/WbJTVnlUZd
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
27) Further, in the letters I have reviewed, emotional constituents are usually hyper-specific about their complaints — never vague. Logically, that is why they are writing to Congress: to remedy a wrong that is clear to them, but not others.
So “early 1980’s” is not normal. pic.twitter.com/sOYc4sPf2G
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
28) Here’s another odd thing. Why didn’t she put Kavanaugh’s name in the first line, eg “I am writing to express my concerns about Judge Brett Kavanaugh.” pic.twitter.com/wQbQFrfJun
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
28) Here’s another odd thing. Why didn’t she put Kavanaugh’s name in the first line, eg “I am writing to express my concerns about Judge Brett Kavanaugh.” pic.twitter.com/wQbQFrfJun
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
29) Why did the writer of the letter go to such pains to say: “I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since…”
What does “knowingly” refer to?
Was she drunk at other parties and can’t remember him? pic.twitter.com/olQ5FxRPwg— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
30) “They” locked the door. Who is “they?” Which one? Both together? pic.twitter.com/HtZJWe56FH
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
31) “a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh” — this is the writing of either an illiterate or someone for whom English is a second language.
—“Very drunken”? She means “very drunk.”
—“Mixed words?” She means “said contradictory things.” pic.twitter.com/t73djlNI7r
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
32) This is not to offend people who don’t have good English skills or who are struggling to learn. Rather it is to point out that the letter does not reflect someone of Dr. Ford’s professional rank.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
33) The awkward English and poor grammar is interspersed with flowery language.
“The two scrapped with each other,” for example.
“I was able to take this opportune moment.” pic.twitter.com/N8OIUHWFIP
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
34) Why does she refer to psychotherapy as “medical treatment?” pic.twitter.com/Ha4tpy8Gy7
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
34) Why does she refer to psychotherapy as “medical treatment?” pic.twitter.com/Ha4tpy8Gy7
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
36) Another example: The letter writer refers to the same bathroom twice, but the second mention makes it sound like it is a totally different bathroom. pic.twitter.com/Uqva0uwjls
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
36) Another example: The letter writer refers to the same bathroom twice, but the second mention makes it sound like it is a totally different bathroom. pic.twitter.com/Uqva0uwjls
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
37) If she is married and published under her married name why is she using her maiden name? pic.twitter.com/FVOQqrqRyt
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
38) Why doesn’t she refer to herself as “Dr.?” Where is her return address? Where is Feinstein’s address? Eshoo’s? pic.twitter.com/3fwyYctT1c
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
39) The word “confidential” appears three times, once in bold. Where did Ford agree to have her name released again? pic.twitter.com/gfDgEPUu6J
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
39) The word “confidential” appears three times, once in bold. Where did Ford agree to have her name released again? pic.twitter.com/gfDgEPUu6J
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
41) Where is the Privacy Release Form that would allow Feinstein to inquire on Ford’s behalf?
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
45) This whole story just doesn’t add up.
Starting with that very fake-sounding letter.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
13) I find it ironic that the same people who want to use government money in our schools to teach children to have sex — the same people who plant articles in Teen Vogue about sodomy — are the ones who scream “RAAAAPPPEE” because Brett Kavanaugh was part of heterosexual life.
— Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle) September 24, 2018
So, there you have it. What do you think?
