California Governor Gavin Newsom has to be one of the most corrupt politicians out there. The man is absolutely hell-bent on destroying what is left of one of the most beautiful states in the country with his insane ultra-liberal policies. Now, the wannabe dictator is considering a new push to punish gun owners in the golden state and you will never guess where he is getting the inspiration from.
Just a few days ago, the Supreme Court upheld the state’s right to prohibit abortion services once a fetal heartbeat was detected.
The SCOTUS gave the state their power back which is 100% constitutional to put limits on abortion on demand.
According to Texas Senate Bill 8, abortions are forbidden once a fetal heartbeat is discovered, and the legislation empowers anyone to file a civil lawsuit against anybody who conducts an illegal abortion on them or their children.
Well, that has liberals like Newsom in an uproar. So, the radical governor is planning on using the very framework of this bill in Texas and using it to go after gun rights.
If this were to pass in California it would allow private citizens to sue those who manufacture or sell so-called assault weapons or ghost guns, according to the governor of a left-wing state that is losing citizens.
‘I am appalled by yesterday’s decision by the United States Supreme Court, which upheld Texas’s prohibition on most abortion services…” While proposing his plan, Newsom screamed at the top of his lungs on Twitter, followed by the words, “If the most effective way to keep these terrible weapons off our streets is to add the fear of private litigation, we should do precisely that.”
SCOTUS is letting private citizens in Texas sue to stop abortion?!
If that's the precedent then we'll let Californians sue those who put ghost guns and assault weapons on our streets.
If TX can ban abortion and endanger lives, CA can ban deadly weapons of war and save lives. https://t.co/N5Iur9PEUZ
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) December 12, 2021
According to reports, Newsom asked his staff, the state legislature, and the state’s Democratic attorney general to draft legislation that “would establish a private right of action allowing private citizens to seek injunctive relief and statutory damages of at least $10,000 per violation, as well as costs and attorney’s fees, against anyone who manufactures, distributes, or sells an assault weapon or ghost gun kit or parts in the State of California.”
Newsom also asked the state’s Republican attorney general to draft legislation that “would establish a right of action.
Here is more from Wayne Dupree:
The Firearms Policy Coalition, a non-profit organization located in California, is prepared to take the Democrat governor all the way to the United States Supreme Court.
In a statement, the organization stated that “if Gavin Newsom wants to play a game of constitutional chicken, we will prevail.”
Newsom’s idea would first have to be approved by the California legislature, which will return in January to consider it. Despite the fact that California has full-time, well-compensated lawmakers, it takes an average of roughly nine months for new legislation to be passed.
Governor Gavin Newsom is pushing for the proposal, but state Sen. Brian Dahle, a Republican from rural northeast California, is against it and feels it is a ruse to gather support from his radical base ahead of a prospective presidential bid.
In Dahle’s words, “the right to have guns is distinct from the right to obtain an abortion.” “The right to an abortion does not constitute a constitutional amendment. ” As a result, I believe he is well off the mark.”
Well, Dahle is exactly correct.
Firearms are mentioned rather explicable in the constitution and in the Bill of Rights and abortion is not. However, either was healthcare and we know how that turned out.
This will be a fight for sure and if it were to pass there you know it would only be a matter of time before it spread everywhere.
