• October 27, 2021

Crooked General Milley Caught Working Directly With Communist China!

What is happening in our country right now is incredibly disheartening and it just makes me wonder how much longer we can even last as a nation. How can we even survive when we have leaders in every branch undermining everything we stand for as a country?

We used to be the best of the best but with the left watering down our nation with woke policies and social justice we are a shell of the country we used to be.

Now, those policies and have ended up in our military with the emergence of woke generals.

A private that has been revealed between Mark Milley and Chinese officials shows just how dire our situation is with the woke generation.

In this phone call, Milley personally assured China that he would give them advance warning if the U.S. was ever going to attack.

Specifically, Mark Milley said:

If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.

Here’s a question:

Why would our generals ever give advance notice to a foreign enemy before an attack?

Isn’t the element of a surprise what you want?

Why are our military generals trying to protect China?

More details from this bombshell revelation are below:

The Washington Post confirms:

Twice in the final months of the Trump administration, the country’s top military officer was so fearful that the president’s actions might spark a war with China that he moved urgently to avert armed conflict.

In a pair of secret phone calls, Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, assured his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army, that the United States would not strike, according to a new book by Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward and national political reporter Robert Costa.

One call took place on Oct. 30, 2020, four days before the election that unseated President Trump, and the other on Jan. 8, 2021, two days after the Capitol siege carried out by his supporters in a quest to cancel the vote.

The first call was prompted by Milley’s review of intelligence suggesting the Chinese believed the United States was preparing to attack. That belief, the authors write, was based on tensions over military exercises in the South China Sea, and deepened by Trump’s belligerent rhetoric toward China.

“General Li, I want to assure you that the American government is stable and everything is going to be okay,” Milley told him. “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.”

In the book’s account, Milley went so far as to pledge he would alert his counterpart in the event of a U.S. attack, stressing the rapport they’d established through a backchannel. “General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”

Li took the chairman at his word, the authors write in the book, “Peril,” which is set to be released next week.

In the second call, placed to address Chinese fears about the events of Jan. 6, Li wasn’t as easily assuaged, even after Milley promised him, “We are 100 percent steady. Everything’s fine. But democracy can be sloppy sometimes.”

Li remained rattled, and Milley, who did not relay the conversation to Trump, according to the book, understood why. The chairman, 62 at the time and chosen by Trump in 2018, believed the president had suffered a mental decline after the election, the authors write, a view he communicated to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a phone call on Jan. 8. He agreed with her evaluation that Trump was unstable, according to a call transcript obtained by the authors.

Believing that China could lash out if it felt at risk from an unpredictable and vengeful American president, Milley took action. The same day, he called the admiral overseeing the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, the military unit responsible for Asia and the Pacific region, and recommended postponing the military exercises, according to the book. The admiral complied.

Milley also summoned senior officers to review the procedures for launching nuclear weapons, saying the president alone could give the order — but, crucially, that he, Milley, also had to be involved. Looking each in the eye, Milley asked the officers to affirm that they had understood, the authors write, in what he considered an “oath.”

Some sitting Congressmen and women are also speaking out, saying that Milley did indeed commit treason.

Do you think Mark Milley was acting in the best interest of the American people?

Was he trying to protect us?

Or is he guilty of treason?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below!


Related post