In The News

Julian Assange Says He May Release a Lot More Information Concerning 2016 Election


If you live in Philadelphia and you feel a powerful tremor, it’s not an earthquake it’s the democrats shaking in their boots as Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in an interview with CNN on Tuesday, said that he has more to release concerning the 2016 election.  CNN tried to get Assange to confirm or deny that the information came from Russia.  He refused saying that to deny sources would make it easier to pinpoint the real source.  He noted that was a long time policy of Wikileaks, but he did say that someday the true source could step forward and a lot of people would have egg on their face.  (A Bernie supporter at the DNC perhaps?)

“Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces. But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are.”

From CNN:

Speaking from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he faces extradition over sexual assault allegations, Assange told CNN that Democratic Party officials were using the specter of Russian involvement to distract from the content of the emails, which have had tumultuous affect on the party at the start of its national convention, where it is expected to make Hillary Clinton its presidential nominee.
“It raises questions about the natural instincts of Clinton that when confronted with a serious domestic political scandal, she tries to blame the Russians, blame the Chinese, et cetera,” Assange told CNN.
“Because if she does that while in government, it could lead to problems,” he added.
Does it matter whether it came from Russia or some other source? Of course not.  When another famous traitor, Benedict Arnold was caught because of the discovery of papers where he intended to give the British West Point, he did not blame it on the French because it sisn’t matter who turned over the papers.  The democrats are trying to convince people that it really matters if their corruption was discovered by the Russians.  If they weren’t corrupt, there would be no problem.
To Top