WSJ: What Happens if You Throw Our Illegal Aliens


For quite a while now there has been an argument between the liberals and conservatives on the illegal immigration question.  Liberals insist that illegals are a benefit to our economy.  (You have to remember that this is the party that says the fastest way to recover from a recession is more unemployment benefits)  One state, Arizona passed legislation that made it very uncomfortable for illegal aliens and they moved out in huge numbers.

The WSJ (Wall Street Journal) decided to commission a study to see what the end result would be.  They didn’t get the results they wanted as the WSJ is an Open Borders kind of company.  The results will not surprise many of you.

  1.  The number of illegal aliens dropped by 40%……..The median income of low-skilled whites who did manage to get jobs rose about 6% during that period, the economists estimate … wages rose about 15% for Arizona farmworkers and about 10% for construction between 2010 and 2014 … Some employers say their need for workers has increased since then, leading them to boost wages more rapidly and crimping their ability to expand … graduates [at a federal job-training center] now often mull two or three jobs offers from construction firms and occasionally start at $14.65 an hour instead of $10 …  At DTR Landscape Development LLC, the firm’s president, Dick Roberts, says he has increased his starting wage by 60% to $14.50 an hour because he is having trouble finding reliable workers.
  2. The state saves money on welfare costs…………...The number of students enrolled in intensive English courses in Arizona public schools fell from 150,000 in 2008 to 70,000 in 2012 and has remained constant since. Schooling 80,000 fewer students would save the state roughly $350 million a year, by one measure … annual emergency-room spending on noncitizens fell 37% to $106 million, from $167 million. And between 2010 and 2014, the annual cost to state prisons of incarcerating noncitizens convicted of felonies fell 11% to $180 million, from $202 million.
  3. Housing Costs.……….“It was like, ‘Where did everybody go?’ ” says Teresa Acuna, a Phoenix real-estate agent who works in Latino neighborhoods. Real-estate agent Patti Gorski says her sales records show that prices of homes owned by Spanish-speaking customers fell by 63% between 2007 and 2010, compared with a 44% drop for English-speaking customers, a difference she attributes partly to financial pressure on owners who had been renting homes to immigrants who departed.
  4. Without cheap labor, companies invested in new machinery…..

    After Arizona passed a series of tough anti-immigration laws, Rob Knorr couldn’t find enough Mexican field hands to pick his jalapeño peppers. He sharply reduced his acreage and invested $2 million developing a machine to remove pepper stems. His goal was to cut the number of laborers he needed by 90% and to hire higher-paid U.S. machinists instead …

    He says mechanization is his future. He continues to pour time and money into a laser-guided device to remove stems from peppers, which pickers now do by hand in the field. Another farmer in the area developed a mechanical carrot harvester.

    Mr. Knorr says he is willing to pay $20 an hour to operators of harvesters and other machines, compared with about $13 an hour for field hands. He says he can hire skilled machinists at community colleges, so he can rely less on migrant labor.

    (Wait a dang minute.  Farm labor pays thirteen dollars an hour?  I’ll bet there are a lot of Americans with no skills that would love a job like that.  Just think what would happen if we removed that many illegals from every state.  Can you say economic recovery?


To Top