During his sham of a presidency, Barack Hussein Obama sent an unprecedented number of Muslim refugees to the state of Michigan. As a result, these Muslims now think they can enforce Shariah law in the state. One Republican lawmaker, however, wasn’t having any of it.

Representative Michele Hoitenga just introduced a law that will prevent Michigan courts from considering foreign laws when rendering their decisions. Though the law does not specifically mention Muslims, it will prevent them from enforcing Sharia Law in Michigan.
Hoitenga introduced the law after a Muslim doctor was arrested in Detroit for committing female genital mutilation. Patients had been driving in from all over Michigan to receive the Muslim doctor’s “treatments.”

If enacted, Hoitenga’s bill would “limit the application and enforcement by a court, arbitrator, or administrative body of foreign laws that would impair constitutional rights; to provide for modification or voiding of certain contractual provisions or agreements that would result in a violation of constitutional rights; and to require a court, arbitrator, or administrative body to take certain actions to prevent violation of constitutional rights,” and would apply “only to actual or foreseeable violations of the constitutional rights of a person caused by the 16 application of the foreign law.”

For some time now I’ve heard liberals ask what do we have to worry about?  It’s just for contract negotiation and such, it’s no different than an arbitration.  Liberals purposely refuse to see the big picture.  The Muslims who advocate Shariah law tell us they don’t want to replace our legal system, with Shariah, but they are lying, because they do.

As of 2015 there are an estimated 3 million Muslims residing in the United States as citizens or with permanent legal status, and more than 250,000 new Muslim residents enter the U.S. per year as refugees, on work visas and student-based visas, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.

A poll commissioned in May 2015 by the Center for Security Policy showed that 51 percent of American Muslims preferred that they should have their own Shariah courts outside of the legal system ruled by the U.S. Constitution. And nearly a quarter believed the use of violent jihad was justified in establishing Shariah.

“That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that Shariah is ‘The Muslim God Allah’s law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad,’” writes Frank Gaffney Jr., president of the Center for Security Policy.

It is bad enough that we have Democrats who don’t like the Constitution, but now we have a large group of immigrant people who do not want to assimilate into our society and who want to replace our legal system with Shariah law. This is why Michele Hoitenga’s bill is so important. We know that the Left will cry racism and Islamophobia, but we need to stay the course, otherwise we’re throwing western culture out the window.

Read more at Truth Monitor